Nathan Winograd famous quotes

Simply put, killing healthy or treatable animals is immoral.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Animal #Healthy #Killing

In the final analysis, animals in shelters are not being killed because there are too many of them, because there are too few homes, or because the public is irresponsible. Animals in shelters are dying for primarily one reason–because people in shelters are killing them.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Home #Animal #People

A veterinarian who naively gave PETA some of the animals, thinking they would find them homes, and examined the dead bodies of others, testified that they were 'healthy' and 'adoptable.'
-- Nathan Winograd

#Home #Thinking #Animal

While spay neuter is important, our goal has never been no more births, even though reducing birth rates might help. Our goal has been and is, and has always been no more killing. And when you focus on the no more killing part, spay neuter actually takes a backseat to all those other programs like foster care, and adoptions, and helping people overcome the challenges they face that cause them to surrender their animals.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Animal #People #Goal

To the extent that animals continue to die needlessly, we are morally bound to speak.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Animal #Speak

If every animal shelter in the United States embraced the No Kill philosophy and the programs and services that make it possible, we would save nearly four million dogs and cats who are scheduled to die in shelters this year, and the year after that. It is not an impossible dream.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Dream #Dog #Philosophy

Communities of every demographic (north, south, urban, rural, public animal control shelter, private shelter) have achieved No Kill success.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Animal #Community #Shelter

No Kill may be defined by what happens to the animals within the halls of the shelter, but it can only be achieved by what happens outside of them.
-- Nathan Winograd

#Animal #May #Shelter

I'm a vegetarian and very much active in regards to how I feel about animal rights and protecting animals and giving animals a voice. But at the same time, I appreciate and respect other people's decisions to eat meat. The only thing that I hope is that people are educated, that they're aware, that they're living a conscious lifestyle.

Man is a perpetually wanting animal.

We need a way of life in which the animal, guided by reason, may romp but will not bite.

Some, while deploring animal abuses, on the same breath approve 'benefits to humans from certain animal abuses'! Who would criticize the Jewish holocaust or Black slavery, and YET praise the benefits to Germans or Whites??? This convenient ambiguity at the expense of animals is unacceptable!!!

I hear it's better to use animal products than synthetics, which are harmful to humans and the earth... but destroying one segment of the creation to allegedly save another is the idea of fools!!!

There is a healthy American newspaper tradition of not taking yourself seriously It is the story you must take that way... And if you do take yourself seriously, according to this sound convention, you are supposed to do your best not to let anyone else know about it. (Like bed-wetting.)

In a healthy nation there is a kind of dramatic balance between the will of the people and the government, which prevents its degeneration into tyranny.

Instead of killing and dying in order to produce the being that we are not, we have to live and let live in order to create what we are.

Broadchurch' is very different, but it's equally as good as 'The Killing' - if not better.

Killing Intel, I, I just had to resign from the Apple Board.